Global Warming Petition
Over 31,000 scientists have signed the Petition Project:
We urge the United States government to reject the global warming agreement that was written in Kyoto, Japan in December, 1997, and any other similar proposals. The proposed limits on greenhouse gases would harm the environment, hinder the advance of science and technology, and damage the health and welfare of mankind.
There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gasses is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate. Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth.
Delicious
Digg
Fark
Google Bookmarks
Live Favorites
Netscape
Newsvine
Reddit
Slashdot
Stumbleupon
Technorati Favorites
Yahoo MyWeb
3 comments
2 trackbacks
3 comments
6 months ago
I don't think my local rulers were listening here downunder:
The Great Madness begins...
With all throttles wide-open to gain way against the tide of scientific opinion, kangaroo-land flaunts reason; and surrenders any claim to respect by nominating C02 a pollutant.
We don't breathe this gas 24/7?
C02 pollutes the integrity of political parties and slick business; but they do not appear to be using «pollution» in that context.
QUOTE The Australian, Cathy Alexander, May 20, 2008:
AUSTRALIA'S emissions trading market has been unofficially born – and the all-important carbon price has started at $19 a tonne.
Energy giant AGL has sold banking giant Westpac 10,000 tonnes of «permits to pollute».
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23730759-12377,00.html
6 months ago
Oh Butters!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oregon_Petition
Half the fake signatures are MD's and there is no real peer reviewed data, and a good chunk of the names are fictious, tombstoned names, or are names like John Travolta, Micheal J Fox, and so on.
2 months and 6 days ago
For a better understanding of the nature of this alleged peer reviewed paper see
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Oregon_Institute_of_Science_and_Medicine
OISM seems to be a place where science is not done well enough to stand the test of peer review.
Write a comment
If you want to add your comment on this post, simply fill out the next form:
* Required fields
You can use these XHTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>.
2 trackbacks
To notify a mention on this post in your blog, enable automated notification (Options > Discussion in WordPress) or specify this trackback url: http://www.thehammondreport.com/global-warming-petition/trackback/